Research Article |
Corresponding author: A. A. Zotin ( zotin@idbras.ru ) Academic editor: Yuliya V. Bespalaya
© 2019 A. A. Zotin, E. P. Ieshko.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Zotin AA, Ieshko EP (2019) Quantification of mantle attachment scars on the Margaritifera margaritifera (Margaritiferidae, Bivalvia) shell. Arctic Environmental Research 19(2): 81-86. https://doi.org/10.3897/issn2541-8416.2019.19.1.81
|
A characteristic feature shared by all Margaritiferidae mussels consists in the presence of scars on the internal surface of their shells. These scars mark places of mantle attachment by specific epithelial cells. According to some authors, such parameters of mantle attachment scars as the density and degree of their manifestation can be used for the purposes of species identification. To this end, quality indicators (numerous or few, pronounced or poorly visible scars) are typically used; however, the use of quantitative criteria is preferable. This work was aimed at developing quantitative indicators of mantle attachment scars in the Margaritifera margaritifera freshwater pearl mussels for the populations of the Syuskyuyanyoki and Livoyoki rivers (Karelia). It is shown that the density and size of mantle attachment scars are approximately the same for all the investigated shell samples. These parameters display the absence of dependence on the age and size of molluscs. The regression coefficients for the linear dependence of the density or size of mantle attachment scars on the age or length of the shell show no significant difference from 0. For all the investigated molluscs, the density and size of mantle attachment scars are established to vary within the range of 0.37–1.16 scars/cm2 (0.71 ± 0.03 scars/cm2 on average) and 215–690 µm (417 ± 2 µm on average), respectively. According to a two-factor analysis of variance, the distribution of mantle attachment scars appears to be irregular across the shell surface. At the same time, a significant (p < 0.001) increase in their density is observed in the posterior and ventral directions, as well as diagonally in the posterior ventral direction. Issues associated with the application of the investigated parameters for the purposes of mollusc species identification are discussed.
bivalve mussels, density of mantle attachment scars, freshwater pearl mussels, Livoyoki river, Syuskyuyanyoki river
For the majority of bivalve molluscs, the mantle is attached to the shell by retractor muscles located along the mantle line (
In this work, we aimed to conduct a quantitative analysis of mantle attachment scars on the shell surface of Margaritifera margaritifera L. 1785 by their density, size and distribution pattern.
Samples of M. margaritifera (Margaritiferidae, Bivalvia) shells were collected across the riverbed and along the banks of the Syuskyuyanyoki (Lake Onega basin, Karelia) and Livoyoki (Kem river basin, Karelia) rivers. A total of 30 molluscs from the population of the Syuskyuyanyoki river and 13 molluscs from the population of the Livoyoki river were examined.
The images of the side of the shell pearlescent layer were obtained using an HPScanJet5400c scanner (China). A grid was applied on the obtained images dividing the shell into four parts along the length and into three parts along the width (Fig.
A Division scheme of a shell surface into cells; A–D: posterior-anterior direction, 1–3: dorso-ventral direction. B Mantle attachment scars (MS) on the inner surface of a Margaritifera margaritifera shell
For each cell and the entire valve, the area S of the projection of the pearl layer onto the plane was measured using the UniversalDesktopRuler 3.8 program (AVPSoft, Russia). The density of mantle attachment scars was calculated by the n/S and Σn/ΣS formulas for each cell and the entire valve, respectively. The shell length and the maximum size of each mantle attachment scar were also measured using UniversalDesktopRuler 3.8 (AVPSoft, Russia).
The average values and standard errors of the mean for the density of mantle attachment scars and their size were calculated. When the number of data was lower than 50, the hypothesis of normal distribution of the data was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk 1965). Otherwise, the χ2 criterion (
The distribution of the density of mantle attachment scars on the shell surface was evaluated using a two-factor ANOVA. In other cases, a one-factor ANOVA was used (
The dependence of the density of mantle attachment scars on the age and length of the mollusc shell was estimated using linear regression analysis (
According to the criteria used for the distribution of all compared parameters, such as the density and size of mantle attachment scars for each cell and the entire valve, the average values for different molluscs have shown no difference from the normal distribution.
According to one-factor ANOVA, significant differences in the density of mantle attachment scars and their sizes are not significant when comparing the following parameters: right and left valves, different individuals in each of the populations studied, molluscs from different populations.
No dependences of the density of mantle attachment scars and their maximum size on age were established (Fig.
Dependencies of the density of mantle attachment scars (top) and their sizes (bottom) on age. The circles denote experimental data. Lines are approximation by linear regression equations: for the upper plot Y = 0.0001X+0.7167 (R2 = 3×10-5); for the lower plot Y = 0.153X+412.75 (R2 = 0.0069)
For all the studied molluscs, the density of mantle attachment scars varies from 0.37 to 1.16 scars/cm2 and equals 0.71 ± 0.03 scars/cm2 (n = 43) on average. The maximum size of mantle attachment scars varies from 215 to 690 µm, with its average value being 417 ± 2 µm (n = 1984).
The analysis of the distribution of mantle attachment scars on the shell surface has shown no significant difference in their density for the same cells in different shells regardless of whether the right or left valve of the same mussel, different individuals of the same population or mussels of different populations were compared. The average densities of mantle attachment scars are presented in Table
According to a two-factor ANOVA, the distribution of mantle attachment scars appears to be irregular across the shell surface. At the same time, a significant increase in their density is observed in the posterior direction (20.2%, p < 0.001), ventral direction (7.4%, p < 0.001) and diagonally in the posterior ventral direction (5.5%, p < 0.001) (Fig.
The density distribution of the mantle attachment scars on the Margaritifera margaritifera valve. The numbers above the columns display average values for all the studied molluscs in this cell
The average density of mantle attachment scars per 1 cm2 in different cells of the shell
Line | Column | Entire valve | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ||
Population of the Syskyuyanyoki river (30 samples) | |||||
Left valve | |||||
1 | 0.49 ± 0.14 | 0.55 ± 0.08 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.24 ± 0.09 | 0.66 ± 0.05 |
2 | 0.78 ± 0.13 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.08 | |
3 | 1.00 ± 0.20 | 0.95 ± 0.10 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | |
Right valve | |||||
1 | 0.90 ± 0.20 | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 0.42 ± 0.07 | 0.67 ± 0.24 | 0.66 ± 0.05 |
2 | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 0.68 ± 0.08 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.64 ± 0.10 | |
3 | 1.12 ± 0.16 | 0.81 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.17 | |
Population of the Livoyoki river (13 samples) | |||||
Left valve | |||||
1 | 1.28 ± 0.48 | 1.12 ± 0.25 | 0.76 ± 0.17 | 0.69 ± 0.38 | 0.87 ± 0.10 |
2 | 0.96 ± 0.09 | 1.09 ± 0.10 | 0.63 ± 0.09 | 0.73 ± 0.10 | |
3 | 0.75 ± 0.14 | 0.57 ± 0.10 | 0.96 ± 0.10 | 0.72 ± 0.13 | |
Right valve | |||||
1 | 1.47 ± 0.30 | 1.13 ± 0.21 | 1.20 ± 0.45 | 1.17 ± 0.47 | 0.88 ± 0.10 |
2 | 1.11 ± 0.17 | 1.26 ± 0.17 | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | |
3 | 0.75 ± 0.11 | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 0.69 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.09 |
According to the obtained data, at least for two M. margaritifera populations, the density, surface distribution and size of mantle attachment scars are the same for different mussels both within the same population and for different populations. The density of mantle attachment scars tends to increase in the posterior and ventral directions, which agrees well with Smith’s data obtained for various species of Margaritiferidae (
We found only one publication on the density of mantle attachment scars, in which three species of Far Eastern pearl mussels – M. dahurica Middendorff 1850, M. laevis Haas 1910 and M. middendorffi Rozen 1926 – showed no significant difference in terms of this parameter (
As a result, we obtained the following values for the density of mantle attachment scars for M. dahurica, M. laevis and M. middendorffi: 0.30 ± 0.08, 0.36 ± 0.04 and 0.26 ± 0.01 scars/cm2, respectively. For each species, the measurements were carried out for four valves. The differences of these values for the three Far Eastern species are found to be insignificant, though they are significantly lower than those for M. margaritifera (0.71 ± 0.03 scars/cm2; p < 0.001). At the same time, the density of mantle attachment scars for M. falcata (0.87 ± 0.12 scars/cm2, 5 valves) is similar to that for M. margaritifera (the differences are insignificant). Thus, it can be assumed that the density of mantle attachment scars can indeed serve as a diagnostic parameter, at least in distinguishing the European species M. margaritifera and the American species M. falcata from the Far Eastern ones.
Another indicator claiming to be the key in determining species consists in the size of mantle attachment scars. According to our calculations, the largest sizes of scars are observed for M. dahurica (687 ± 15 µm, n = 47). For M. laevis, M. middendorffi and M. margaritifera, the size of mantle attachment scars is approximately the same, being equal to 445 ± 9 µm (n = 58), 433 ± 31 µm (n = 14) and 417 ± 2 µm (n = 1984), respectively. For M. falcata, the size of mantle attachment scars is smaller and is estimated to be 202 ± 22 µm on average (n = 49). The smallest values of this parameter, which were calculated only for two scars on one shell by the image given in (
It goes without saying that the small number of conducted measurements imposes constraints on using the density and size of mantle attachment scars as a parameter of species differentiation. Further studies are required to confirm this hypothesis.
No differences in the size and density of the mantle attachment scars on the inner surface of M. margaritifera shells were found either within the populations or between the populations inhabiting the Syuskyuyanyoki and Livoyoki rivers. Therefore, the studied quantitative parameters have shown a certain level of stability. A preliminary analysis of our own and literature data suggests that both the density of mantle attachment scars and their size can be applicable as key features in distinguishing species. According to the density of mantle attachment scars, Margaritifera molluscs can be divided into two groups: M. dahurica, M. laevis, M. middendorffi (scar density is app. 0.3/cm2) and M. margaritifera, M. falcata (scar density is app. 0.7-0.8/cm2). In terms of the size of mantle attachment scars, the following four groups of species can be distinguished: M. dahurica (the size of mantle attachment scars is about 700 µm), M. laevis, M. middendorffi and M. margaritifera (~400 µm), M. falcata (~200 µm) and Gibbosula laosensis (~50 µm).
The study was conducted as part of the state program of basic scientific research of the Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 0108-2019-0003. The study was carried out under state order (project № 0218-2019-0075).